Layoff Tracker
/
Superpedestrian

Superpedestrian Layoffs: What Happened & Why?

June 22, 2022
United States
Transportation

In June 2022, the micromobility industry experienced significant challenges as companies like Voi Technology and Superpedestrian announced layoffs. Voi is reducing its workforce by 35 employees, about 10% of its HQ-related roles, while Superpedestrian is cutting its global team by 7%, also impacting 35 employees. This article explores the reasons behind these layoffs, their impact on the industry, and potential future implications for these companies and their employees.

Why Did Superpedestrian Have Layoffs?

Superpedestrian's decision to lay off 35 employees or 7% of its global team was driven by economic pressures, internal restructurings, and the ongoing struggle for profitability in the micromobility industry. The company is focused on reducing costs and accelerating its path to profitability amidst a challenging economic climate. Mathias Hermansson, CFO and Deputy CEO at Voi, highlighted a strategy focused on profitability and a 25% reduction in headquarter-related costs. Superpedestrian has also confirmed the layoffs, emphasizing their commitment to maintaining high-quality services in cities where they operate shared scooter fleets. These layoffs are indicative of broader job cuts in the micromobility sector, as companies adapt to changing market conditions and strive for profitability.

Financial Impact and Future Directions

By reducing its workforce by 7%, Superpedestrian is likely to achieve both short-term and long-term savings, potentially improving its financial health and positioning it for future success. The company's focus on providing top-quality services in cities with their shared scooter fleets suggests a continued emphasis on this area. Streamlining operations and concentrating on core services might strengthen Superpedestrian's position in the micromobility industry and enable it to adapt to changing market conditions.

Impact on Industry

Superpedestrian's layoffs may influence shifts in the competitive landscape within the transportation industry, particularly in the micromobility sector. As companies face economic pressures and adapt to market changes, these layoffs could signify a trend toward consolidation and a focus on core services. The need for companies to streamline operations and adapt strategies to remain competitive could level the playing field or alter competitive dynamics across the tech and transportation sectors.

Conclusion

The layoffs at Superpedestrian, driven by economic pressures and a focus on profitability, mirror broader challenges within the micromobility industry. As companies streamline operations and concentrate on core services, the competitive landscape may undergo shifts, potentially leading to consolidation. These developments could have lasting implications for the sector, with Superpedestrian and similar companies needing to adjust their strategies to remain viable. The focus on cost reduction and operational efficiency will likely continue to shape their actions moving forward.